Latest player reviews

8 new this week, from players and from around the web.

TodayFri 23 Oct

YonexAstrox 77 Tour

A high-intermediate UK league player who normally uses the Astrox 88D Pro found the Astrox 77 Tour effortless on clears and smashes and easier on the arm in drives at first. Over time the more flexible shaft made placement and defensive timing harder, so it is now a backup for days when their footwork is sluggish.

“The more flexible shaft was making it slightly harder to place my shots accurately, and I struggled a bit with timing on defensive plays due to the added flexibility as well as the lighter head.”
mixedeasy powerforgiving
YonexAstrox 88 Play

A beginner-to-intermediate doubles player has used the Astrox 88 Play since taking up the game a year ago and loves it: versatile, with plenty of power when attacking. Now looking for something similar with a bit more control.

“I quickly purchased the Yonex 88 Play after starting and have loved it ever since I started using it. I like how versatile it is while also allowing me to use great power when attacking.”
positiveeasy power
YonexAstrox 77 Pro

Compared with the original Astrox 77, finds the 77 Pro slightly more head-heavy and stiffer, with more punch from the back court while staying quick for flicks and pushes at the net. Also liked having it in G6 for more control at the net.

“I personally enjoyed the 77pro more as it packed more punch in back court but was still fast for flick and pushes at the net like the og77.”
positiveeasy powerfast handling
VictorThruster Ryuga TD

A heavy smasher about a year into the game plays the Thruster Ryuga TD strung with BG65. Enjoys the raw smash power, but the very head-heavy balance and demanding shaft punish late shots, defence against fast drives and reactions at the net.

“While the raw smash power is fun, the extreme head-heavy balance and demanding shaft heavily penalize me whenever I'm late on a shot, defending fast drives, or reacting at the net.”
mixedeasy powerslow to swingdemanding

Popular this week

most new reviews
  1. Nanoflare 1000 ZYonex+2 reviews
  2. Auraspeed 100X UltraVictor+1 review
  3. Thruster F C UltraVictor+1 review
  4. Thruster Ryuga TDVictor+1 review
VictorAuraspeed 100X Ultra

Tried the Auraspeed 100X Ultra recently and disliked it: the Free Core handle gives very little feedback, and smashes felt far less satisfying than with the Astrox 88D.

“I tried the 100x ultra the other day I hated it, it’s a free core handle racquet, the feedback is very small some people love it I hate it.”
negativeunderpowered
VictorThruster F C Ultra

An upper-beginner singles and lower-intermediate doubles player who owns the Thruster F Claw Ultra finds it not demanding: stiff but whippy, with a forgiving sweet spot thanks to the larger head. Power comes easily from the head weight, though it gets a little tiring and they feel they only get about 80% of their power on clean hits.

“It's stiff, but whippy like the Auraspeed 99 (thanks WES 3.0). It's maybe not as repulsive due to the head being on the larger side, but it in turn has a more forgiving sweet spot.”
positiveforgivingeasy powertiring
YonexNanoflare 1000 Z

Broke their Nanoflare 1000Z on a clean hit and thinks an earlier clash had created a weak point. Treats rackets as long-lasting consumables rather than something that lasts forever.

“Racquets inherently will have weaknesses and small cracks can develop over time from clashes etc. I broke my 1000z from a clean hit before, most likely a previous clash creates a stress point.”
negativedurability issues
YonexNanoflare 1000 Z

A beginner playing the Nanoflare 1000Z strung at 24 lbs finds it very unforgiving on mishits and says the sweet spot is hard to find.

“I'm a beginner who uses the Nanoflare 1000Z and it's incredibly unforgiving on mishits and feels hard to hit the sweet-spot. The tension is 24lbs.”
negativesmall sweet spotdemanding

You've reached the end. Played one of these? Add your own review →